Dan reveals King Charles is “horrified” about the prospect of Harry and Meghan running out of money, as Netflix plans to scrap their $100 million, five-year mega deal.
He says: “I can reveal it is the worst nightmare for King Charles whose courtiers have privately confided the monarch is dreading the possibility of the cash-hungry Sussexes running out of money. That now becomes a much more likely outcome.”
He also analyses why the deal has failed for Netflix, despite Meghan befriending the wife of their co-chief executive Ted Sarandos.
Then the Superstar Panel – Charlie Sansom and Andrew Eborn – give their verdict.
Charlie says: “I still believe Harry and Meghan are going to get divorced, which is going to be a real problem for him with the kids. I think she’s not a very nice person.”
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are grappling with potential financial instability as concerns mount over the future of their Netflix deal.
King Charles is particularly alarmed by the possibility that the streaming giant may end its partnership with the couple due to underwhelming performance and financial issues. This situation has heightened anxieties within the royal family regarding the Sussexes’ ability to maintain their lifestyle and independence.
The royal family’s apprehensions are rooted in the fear that financial difficulties might compel Harry and Meghan to seek support from King Charles, a prospect he is keen to avoid.
Despite Harry’s forthcoming £7 million inheritance, the couple remains heavily reliant on substantial income to sustain their security and lifestyle. The disappointing reception of their content on Netflix, in stark contrast to the successful partnership Netflix enjoys with the Obamas, has led executives to reconsider their commitments to the Sussexes.
Harry and Meghan’s efforts to distance themselves from the royal family have not translated into the commercial success they anticipated. Their ventures, including various documentaries, have struggled to achieve notable success without the support of their royal connections.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have only managed to generate significant commercial interest when linked to their royal heritage, such as with Harry’s autobiography and their Netflix series.
Their critical stance towards the royal family appears to have diminished their appeal to potential partners, in comparison to the more favorable reception of other royal figures like William and Catherine.
Public interest in Harry and Meghan has waned, exacerbated by criticisms of their media deals and personal conduct.
Their Netflix documentary, which included accusations of racism in the UK, has faced backlash and reduced support, contributing to a decline in their popularity.
Future projects, such as Harry’s proposed reality series on polo, face skepticism regarding their potential to recapture public interest.
Despite these challenges, the Invictus Games stand out as a positive contribution from Harry, showcasing his genuine philanthropic efforts amidst the ongoing scrutiny.
Since marrying Meghan, Prince Harry’s transformation has sparked questions about his independence and priorities.
The couple’s shift from royal duties to media engagements reflects their pursuit of personal ambitions and independence. Initially celebrated by the media, Harry’s relationship with Meghan has shifted public opinion, illustrating the significant impact of personal choices on media narratives.
This situation highlights broader issues within celebrity culture, including authenticity and the pressures faced by public figures.
In a separate discussion, Donald Trump has asserted that he had a favorable relationship with Queen Elizabeth II, claiming she regarded him as her favorite President.
Trump’s comments emphasize the Queen’s diplomatic interactions with numerous US Presidents during her reign and reflect ongoing political motivations behind public narratives. Even after her passing, Queen Elizabeth II’s influence continues to shape political discourse and relations between the UK and the US.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)