There was some turmoil at the Oscars, according to ALLOD inside sources familiar with the incident. Kevin Costner was slated to present the Lifetime Achievement Award to this year’s recipient…until he found out who it was.
“The set manager said ‘It’s Whoopi’ and within about half a second, Costner said, ‘Oh hell no.’ He handed the envelope to Cheryl and went back to his seat. Cheryl, who really had nothing to do with anything, handed the envelope to the next closest person, who happened to be Keanu Reeves.”
Keanu took the envelope, handed it to Joe Barron, and followed Costner back to his seat.
“When you can’t even get Keanu Reeves to present your award,” said Barron, “There’s a good chance you should just retire. He’s like…the nicest guy alive. He told me handing her the award would put a target on his back at the marina. He doesn’t even go to the marina.”
At first glance, the story makes no sense. It’s almost as though we did this with Keanu already and it went so well that we figured we’d drop another fave they think is on their side and see what happens.
Anyway, good for you, Costner and Keanu. You’ve kept this nonsense alive for yet another day. God Bless America.
The recent drama at the Oscars has left many in shock, as Kevin Costner reportedly refused to present the Lifetime Achievement Award to this year’s recipient, Whoopi Goldberg. According to sources close to the event, Costner was visibly displeased when he found out the identity of the honoree, causing him to hand the envelope to someone else and return to his seat.The unexpected turn of events led to Keanu Reeves stepping in to pass the envelope to Joe Barron, creating a buzz among attendees. Barron later commented on the situation, expressing his surprise that even the usually amiable Reeves was hesitant to be associated with presenting the award to Goldberg.The incident has sparked speculation and debate among industry insiders and fans alike, with many questioning the motives behind Costner’s apparent refusal. Some have praised him for standing up for his beliefs, while others have criticized him for what they perceive as a lack of professionalism.Regardless of the opinions circulating, one thing is certain – the Oscars never fail to provide their fair share of surprises and controversies. Stay tuned for more updates on this unfolding story and other entertainment news as it develops. Your source for the latest information and insights.
The aftermath of the Oscars incident continues to unfold, with many still questioning Kevin Costner’s actions at the awards ceremony. While some praise his decision to step away from presenting the Lifetime Achievement Award to Whoopi Goldberg, others argue that it was a missed opportunity to show professionalism and respect in the industry.Costner’s abrupt handoff of the envelope to Cheryl, and subsequent passing of the award presentation duties to Keanu Reeves, has left many puzzled and intrigued. Reeves, known for his kind and humble demeanor, appeared hesitant to be involved in the situation, further adding to the confusion surrounding the evening’s events.As the dust settles on the Oscars drama, industry insiders and fans alike are left wondering about the underlying reasons for Costner’s actions. Some speculate that there may have been personal or professional issues at play, while others believe it was simply a matter of individual preference.The incident serves as a reminder that even in the glitzy world of Hollywood, unexpected moments can still occur. Whether it’s a last-minute switch in presenters or a controversial decision, the entertainment industry never fails to keep us on our toes.As the story continues to unfold, we will keep you updated on the latest developments and insights from the entertainment world. Stay tuned for more updates and analysis on this and other trending topics. Follow us for more reliable information and engaging content that you can trust.Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)
