Blake Lively has successfully secured a protective order to prevent her It Ends With Us
co-star, Justin Baldoni, from releasing private and sensitive materials to the public. The decision came after a judge approved her legal team’s motion, which outlined concerns that Baldoni might leak personal videos, emails, and text messages — including exchanges involving Lively’s high-profile friends.
Court documents, obtained by Page Six on Thursday, detailed that the order now classifies
certain evidence as “confidential” and strictly for “attorneys’ eyes only.” This includes non-public photos, videos, audio recordings, details of personal relationships, and even medical and mental health records. However, there’s a notable exception: any documents introduced as evidence during the upcoming trial, scheduled for March 2026, may not remain sealed. The filing specifically notes that the court is “unlikely to seal or otherwise afford confidential treatment” to materials directly referenced during the proceedings, meaning those records could become public.
Despite this loophole, Lively’s team expressed satisfaction with the ruling. Speaking to TMZ, they stated, “The Court rejected the Wayfarer Parties’ objections and entered the protections needed to ensure the free flow of discovery material without any risk of witness intimidation or harm to any individual’s security.” They added that this order allows Lively to proceed with the discovery phase, confident she can gather more evidence to support her claims in court.
On the other side, Baldoni’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, also acknowledged the court’s decision, albeit with a different perspective. He agreed with the judge’s ruling to apply protections to specific categories of evidence but pushed back on the broader scope of Lively’s original request. Freedman claimed that Lively sought an “exceedingly overbroad demand for documents” spanning two and a half years — a motion the court ultimately dismissed.
He emphasized that his team had no interest in accessing Lively’s personal medical or mental health records, countering any implication that they were prying into irrelevant private matters. “We remain focused on the necessary communications that will directly contradict Ms. Lively’s unfounded accusations,” Freedman stated. He further accused Lively’s team of potentially mislabeling key evidence as “trade secrets” in an effort to restrict his client’s defense. “We will oppose any efforts by Ms. Lively and her team to hamper our clients’ ability to defend against her attacks,” he added.
The court’s ruling followed a contentious hearing on March 6, where both legal teams presented their arguments. Lively’s representatives stressed the potential for “irreparable harm” if certain private communications, particularly those involving prominent individuals unrelated to the case, were to be publicly exposed. They argued that the risk extended beyond Lively herself and could affect her friends and family — many of whom are well-known public figures.
All parties ultimately agreed to the protective order’s terms. This development follows a highly publicized legal battle that began in December 2024 when Lively filed a lawsuit against Baldoni, accusing him of sexual harassment. According to the complaint, Baldoni allegedly made inappropriate comments about Lively and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, and brought up his past struggles with porn addiction during their time working together.
Baldoni responded by countersuing Lively and Reynolds in January 2025, seeking $400 million in damages. He later launched a website featuring several text message exchanges between himself and Lively, aiming to defend his reputation and challenge her accusations. While the leaked messages avoided naming any of Lively’s famous friends outright, Baldoni appeared to reference Taylor Swift — whom he described as a “megacelebrity friend” — further fueling speculation and media frenzy.
As the legal battle intensifies, both sides remain entrenched in their positions. Lively continues to pursue her claims with the backing of the newly granted protective order, while Baldoni’s team is determined to fight back against what they call “unfounded accusations.” With the trial still a year away, the public is left watching as this high-stakes legal drama unfolds — and wondering what evidence, if any, might surface when the case finally goes to court.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
