What were the reasons behind Meghan Markle’s decision to turn her mother into a live-in nanny?

In my opinion there has been consistent evidence which demonstrates that Meghan Markle lacks the skills and attitudes required to manage staff and within hours of Archie requiring new born care ( surrogate or not) his first nurse had been dismissed.

Given the fact that there has been much controversy over these two ephemeral children who have been hidden from public view since birth it would have been far preferable to have employed a skilled, highly trained nanny if these children are to achieve recognised childhood benchmarks and to develop coping strategies for later life. Doria Ragland’s life and work history would indicate that she is not the right person for this critical role.

Did shocking footage truly show Lilibet’s biological mother reclaiming her daughter, causing Meghan Markle to panic?

However until that woman, who ever she is comes forward to tell the true story that could be checked out, in all fairness I will continue to believe it is fake. I hasten to add though, what you see above is much what I am expecting to see in the future. And I wouldn’t be too surprised if the above proved to be true after all. .

The logic of all this is quite simple Archie was introduced to the queen and the royal family so he exists. Lilibet I suggest is real too. All that’s really needs to be determined is , how. Something simple I guess, loads of money and a willing other partner. How hard is that.

All flights have flight manifests, AFZ Agh, listing all people on the flight. Yes, even poor plebs like myself, appear on commercial flight manifests. It is the law, and necessary in case of emergencies. Costa Rica is a foreign country to the US. So passports would also be necessary for all of the Harkles.

These are the same issues that came up with all of the lies regarding the “children” being in the UK. To go back even further in time, this issue first came up during Mexit. They left little “Archie” in Canada, but there were no reports of a child leaving with them in the first place. Then the “freedom flight” from Canada to California, no child. Tangled webs, again, from the duplicitous duo.

It is important to consider the impact of Meghan Markle’s decision to have her mother become a live-in nanny for her children. The choice to have a family member take on such a critical role raises questions about Meghan’s ability to effectively manage staff and prioritize the needs of her children.

Some may argue that hiring a skilled and highly trained nanny would be more beneficial for Archie and Lilibet in order to ensure they reach important childhood milestones and develop essential coping mechanisms for the future.

There have been rumors circulating about shocking footage showing Lilibet’s biological mother reclaiming her daughter, causing Meghan to panic. However, in the age of misinformation, it is important to verify the authenticity of such claims before drawing conclusions.

It is crucial to acknowledge that Archie and Lilibet do exist, as evidenced by their interactions with the royal family. The details surrounding their births and upbringing may be shrouded in mystery, but it is likely that simple explanations exist for their existence.

Issues such as flight manifests and passport requirements further complicate the narrative surrounding the Harkle family’s movements and decisions. It is essential to separate fact from fiction when discussing their actions and motivations.

As we continue to follow this story, it is important to approach it with a critical eye and seek out verified information to better understand the dynamics at play within the royal family.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: New York Post