Turkey has banned the use of adults-only platforms after people were uploading what they have classed as ‘obscene’ photos and videos online and on social media
Katie Price could face more punishment while in Turkey.
The star jetted off for even more plastic surgery recently. An arrest warrant was issued in the UK after she failed to attend a bankruptcy court date.
But the mum-of-five, who has slammed suggestions she is running from her legal issues, could face the wrath of the Turkish government now too.
The country has strict laws restricting the use of adults-only platforms.
Turkish social media stars have also been arrested for distributing “obscene” content. However it’s not clear what sort of punishment they would face.
Katie, 46, has been uploading content to her subscription page while in Turkey, according to The Sun. She offered subscribers the chance to see a saucy snap while she is out there.
For an extra £10 on top of the £12-a-month fee, Katie said: “Babe, I’ve got this sunbathing selfie video for you today. I hope you love it. Showing my new boobs in this tiny, tiny bikini.”
She also reportedly offered up am £8 snap from her hotel. The reality star said: “Hotel room selfie just for you babe.”
Katie is out in Turkey after getting a face-lift in Istanbul. She’s out there with boyfriend JJ Slater and her eldest son Harvey.
But she may want to re-think her social media use while out there. One Turkish content creator, using the name “Sarem Uysal”, was arrested this year for her “semi-naked” Instagram photos.
It would be a new telling off for Katie, whose issues back in the UK largely stem from her finances. Last month, an arrest warrant was issued as she did not attend a bankruptcy hearing.
Judge Barton said: “It is in my judgment necessary that the court issue a warrant for Ms Price’s arrest. She has no real excuse in failing to attend today’s hearing. The reason for her absence today is irrelevant.”
She has also been ordered to pay £25,000 in costs, as well as monthly instalments of £12,500. Katie had reportedly agreed to pay but had not at the time of the hearing.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: New York Post