The judge who confirmed Lauryn Goodman’s embarrassing court defeat appeared to scorn the Influencer in a savage summing up.

The 33-year-old today lost her court battle with the Manchester City right-back after a list of staggering demands were made.

Including a new £70,000 car every four years and the football pitch for her children to use in her garden. 

In a scathing court ruling delivered this afternoon, Lauryn was accused of cashing in on Kyle’s betrayal of wife Annie Kilner..

As the judge ripped into her for treating the footballer as an “open-ended chequebook”.

Honour Judge Edward Hess delivered his verdict earlier and said Lauryn didn’t have a “good track record of telling the truth” and was “often difficult, unreasonable and demanding.” 

He also accused the mum, of “not planning to move to any employed work but would wish to develop her life as ‘a celebrity’”.

He also appeared unsure if a mega-money astroturf football pitch for her one-year-old ‘future Lioness’ daughter was needed, and cast doubt over her talent-spotting skills by reminding her the tot is not yet walking. He ruled out the majority of Lauryn’s financial demands, which she made in the wake of the arrival of their daughter, who was born while Kyle was married to his wife, Annie Kilner.

The judge said: “The evidence before me has amply demonstrated that the mother was able to leverage these substantial increases by hinting that she would go public on the paternity issue and also threatening that if she did not get what she wanted she would select a home a stone’s throw away from the father’s family home in Cheshire rather than in Sussex, an idea which she knew horrified the father.

“Throughout 2023, he sought to keep secret the fact that he was Kinara’s father. It is clear from the evidence that he was understandably embarrassed about this fact and anxious about how his wife would react when she found out. In his attempts to persuade the mother to go along with the retention of secrecy, the father gave way to many of the financial demands of the mother which he might otherwise have resisted.

Lauryn “plainly had no intention of keeping the matter secret”, the judge ruled and eventually contacted Kyle’s wife directly. One the £32,000 football pitch demand, he went on: “I remind myself that Kinara has just turned one year old and is not yet walking…the mother surprisingly justified her demand for astroturf by saying that Kinara, by kicking a ball with her left foot from a crawling position, has shown a talent which may suggest a future career as a professional footballer qualified to become a ‘Lioness’.”

On the aircon installation demand, the judge added: “As the father said, on the fairly small number of days in England when it is very hot, any discomfort can usually be dealt with by closing blinds/curtains and deploying a modestly-priced electric fan. That is what happens in his home. Air conditioning is rarely needed in an English home.”

Summing up, Hess said: “My assessment of the mother is that she was not reliable, often said what she thought would help her case rather than what was true, failed to make a calm and measured assessment of what she needed and often exaggerated her need to spend money (I think the father was correct to observe that the mother was in many ways treating him as an open-ended cheque book).”

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

Source: New York Post