Wendy Williams has forcefully denied claims that she is suffering from frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a rare condition she called “disgusting” and “fake.”
The former talk show host, who has been at the center of public health discussions in recent years,
made her remarks during a phone interview on *The Breakfast Club* radio show on Wednesday.
In the interview, Williams vehemently rejected the diagnosis, asserting that she was “not incapacitated” and “not a baby.”
“That’s a very rare thing for anybody to have,” the 60-year-old television personality continued.
She also clarified that she was capable of taking care of herself, expressing frustration with the public perception of her health.
“I don’t have frontotemporal dementia,” Williams emphasized, stressing that she felt the diagnosis was entirely fabricated. The radio show appearance marked her strongest public stance on the matter to date, as she continues to challenge the medical diagnosis that has shaped much of the conversation around her health.
However, her comments have sparked further legal action. Hours after Williams’ denial, her legal guardian, Sabrina Morrissey, filed a court request for a new medical evaluation of Williams’ condition. The filing, obtained by *People*, notes that Williams has publicly expressed that she believes she is not suffering from dementia and is not incapacitated. In light of these statements, Morrissey is requesting a comprehensive neurological and psychological evaluation by a specialist in the field, hoping to reassess Williams’ condition with more current and detailed testing.
Morrissey’s filing also pointed out that Williams’ formal diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) was provided by doctors at Weill Cornell Medical Center. According to medical professionals, FTD is a rare and progressive brain disorder that causes changes in behavior, personality, and speech, with no known cure. As part of her guardianship case, Morrissey outlined that Williams’ condition would only deteriorate over time. The guardian’s legal filing insists that Williams’ medical needs and long-term care require the expertise of qualified medical professionals who can provide a clearer, more objective view of her health status.
In addition to addressing the ongoing guardianship and medical issues, Morrissey’s filing also touched on the lawsuit Williams has been involved in following the airing of the 2024 docuseries *Where Is Wendy Williams?* The documentary series, which aired on A&E Television Networks and Lifetime, sparked public debate about Williams’ current state and prompted legal challenges. Morrissey noted that, during the recent radio interview, Williams appeared to suggest that she did not wish to continue with the lawsuit, which had been filed against A&E and its affiliates.
If Williams’ medical evaluation confirms that she possesses the mental capacity to manage her own legal matters, Morrissey has expressed that she would have “no interest” in continuing with the litigation. However, the legal guardian has stressed that the issue of Williams’ capacity to make decisions about her well-being and legal affairs requires careful and professional examination. “The issue of whether [Williams] has the capacity to assess what is in her own best interests deserves renewed careful consideration by qualified experts,” Morrissey’s filing stated, urging that the situation not be left to “careless speculation” in the media or on public platforms.
Williams’ ongoing battle with guardianship and her public assertions about her health have captured widespread attention. In January, she reportedly fired her court-appointed attorney, Linda Redlisky, signaling her desire to regain more control over her legal and personal affairs. Williams’ family has since expressed their intention to find a new lawyer who is both “esteemed and honest” to represent her in the ongoing legal battle.
Amid the legal struggles and public scrutiny, Williams has also shared that she feels “trapped” in an assisted-living facility in New York, fueling concerns about her autonomy and care. As her health and guardianship situation continue to unfold, it is clear that Williams remains determined to assert her independence and reject the diagnoses and legal arrangements that she feels are being imposed upon her.
As this complex situation evolves, the calls for additional evaluations and legal reassessments highlight the ongoing concerns about Wendy Williams’ well-being and the question of who has the right to make decisions on her behalf.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.